MACRO10-year Treasury yield reaches 5.07 percent, highest since 2007Oct 1, 2026
FPHFive Point Holdings Extends Great Park Development Agreement to 2028Oct 1, 2026
$BTCBitcoin Dips 3.2% as Clarity Act Vote Fails in SenateOct 1, 2026
EARNINGSOshkosh Backlog Slides 3.3% Year Over Year Amid Margin PressureOct 1, 2026
WORLDMaine poll shows Collins leads Jackson by 3 pointsOct 1, 2026
WORLDFDA nominee Heidi Overton declines to call healthcare a human rightOct 1, 2026
WORLDFox News outdraws CNN and MS NOW combined in Q3 2026Sep 30, 2026
RVPRetractable Technologies declares quarterly preferred dividendsSep 30, 2026
MACRO10-year Treasury yield reaches 5.07 percent, highest since 2007Oct 1, 2026
FPHFive Point Holdings Extends Great Park Development Agreement to 2028Oct 1, 2026
$BTCBitcoin Dips 3.2% as Clarity Act Vote Fails in SenateOct 1, 2026
EARNINGSOshkosh Backlog Slides 3.3% Year Over Year Amid Margin PressureOct 1, 2026
WORLDMaine poll shows Collins leads Jackson by 3 pointsOct 1, 2026
WORLDFDA nominee Heidi Overton declines to call healthcare a human rightOct 1, 2026
WORLDFox News outdraws CNN and MS NOW combined in Q3 2026Sep 30, 2026
RVPRetractable Technologies declares quarterly preferred dividendsSep 30, 2026

Supreme Court Rules Against Trump in Lisa Cook Federal Reserve Firing Case

The Supreme Court ruled Monday against President Donald Trump's bid to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, upholding long-standing protections for the central bank's independence. Cook, appointed by former President Joe Biden and…

By Reuben Salcedo·Jul 1, 2026·2 min read·macro

Key takeaways

  • The Supreme Court ruled Monday against President Trump's attempt to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, upholding protections for the central bank's independence.
  • Cook, appointed by former President Joe Biden and confirmed to the Fed Board of Governors in May 2022, is the first Black woman to serve in that role, with a term running through January 2038.
  • Trump moved to dismiss Cook in late August, alleging she misrepresented information on three mortgages obtained before she joined the Fed, an accusation she denied and for which she has not been charged.
  • The ruling reinforces that Federal Reserve governors are shielded from at-will presidential removal, insulating interest-rate setting and banking oversight from direct presidential interference.
  • A district court judge blocked the firing on September 9, an appeals court upheld that order, and Monday's Supreme Court decision closed the legal chain.

The Supreme Court ruled Monday against President Donald Trump's bid to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, upholding long-standing protections for the central bank's independence. Cook, appointed by former President Joe Biden and confirmed to the Fed's seven-member Board of Governors in May 2022, is the first Black woman to serve in that role. Her term, extended by a September 2023 reappointment, runs through January 2038.

The Firing Attempt and the Legal Fight

Trump moved to dismiss Cook in late August, alleging she had misrepresented information connected to three mortgages she obtained before joining the Federal Reserve. Cook denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime. She filed suit in federal court in Washington, D.C., to block the removal.

A district court judge issued an order on September 9 barring Trump from firing Cook while the case proceeded — a ruling a federal appeals court subsequently upheld. Monday's Supreme Court decision against the administration closes the legal chain, reinforcing the principle that Fed governors are shielded from at-will presidential removal.

Cook's Seat on the Board of Governors

The seven-member Board of Governors sets national interest rates and oversees the U.S. banking system — the two functions Monday's ruling moves to insulate from direct presidential interference. Cook's term through January 2038 extends well beyond the current administration, meaning the court's decision carries consequences for monetary-policy governance across multiple election cycles.

Cook's Academic and Policy Record

Before the Fed, Cook assembled a record across elite academic institutions and senior government posts. An Oxford alumna and University of California, Berkeley-trained economist, she held faculty positions at Harvard University and Michigan State University and is a graduate of Spelman College. American economist Barry Eichengreen has described Cook as "part economist and historian."

Her government service includes a posting as senior economist on President Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers from 2011 to 2012, and an earlier role as senior adviser on finance and development in the Treasury Department's Office of International Affairs. She speaks French, Russian, Spanish, and Wolof, the last a widely spoken language in Senegal.

Related reading

Share
Source: foxnews.com
© 2026 NewsMeter

Frequently asked

Why did Trump try to fire Lisa Cook?

Trump moved to dismiss Cook in late August, alleging she had misrepresented information connected to three mortgages she obtained before joining the Federal Reserve. Cook denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with a crime.

How long is Lisa Cook's term on the Federal Reserve Board?

Her term, extended by a September 2023 reappointment, runs through January 2038, well beyond the current administration.

What does the Supreme Court's ruling mean for the Federal Reserve?

It reinforces the principle that Fed governors are shielded from at-will presidential removal, insulating interest-rate setting and banking oversight from direct presidential interference.

What is Lisa Cook's professional background?

An Oxford alumna and UC Berkeley-trained economist, Cook held faculty positions at Harvard and Michigan State, graduated from Spelman College, and served as a senior economist on President Obama's Council of Economic Advisers from 2011 to 2012.

What court rulings preceded the Supreme Court decision?

A district court judge issued an order on September 9 barring Trump from firing Cook, and a federal appeals court subsequently upheld that ruling before the Supreme Court decided against the administration.