MACRO10-year Treasury yield reaches 5.07 percent, highest since 2007Oct 1, 2026
FPHFive Point Holdings Extends Great Park Development Agreement to 2028Oct 1, 2026
$BTCBitcoin Dips 3.2% as Clarity Act Vote Fails in SenateOct 1, 2026
EARNINGSOshkosh Backlog Slides 3.3% Year Over Year Amid Margin PressureOct 1, 2026
WORLDMaine poll shows Collins leads Jackson by 3 pointsOct 1, 2026
WORLDFDA nominee Heidi Overton declines to call healthcare a human rightOct 1, 2026
WORLDFox News outdraws CNN and MS NOW combined in Q3 2026Sep 30, 2026
RVPRetractable Technologies declares quarterly preferred dividendsSep 30, 2026
MACRO10-year Treasury yield reaches 5.07 percent, highest since 2007Oct 1, 2026
FPHFive Point Holdings Extends Great Park Development Agreement to 2028Oct 1, 2026
$BTCBitcoin Dips 3.2% as Clarity Act Vote Fails in SenateOct 1, 2026
EARNINGSOshkosh Backlog Slides 3.3% Year Over Year Amid Margin PressureOct 1, 2026
WORLDMaine poll shows Collins leads Jackson by 3 pointsOct 1, 2026
WORLDFDA nominee Heidi Overton declines to call healthcare a human rightOct 1, 2026
WORLDFox News outdraws CNN and MS NOW combined in Q3 2026Sep 30, 2026
RVPRetractable Technologies declares quarterly preferred dividendsSep 30, 2026

Perry's two-paragraph bill targets Biden's vehicle impairment mandate

11,904 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes in 2024, per Mothers Against Drunk Driving. The federal mandate meant to cut that number has no compliant hardware to enforce it. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Penn., now wants to repeal the mandate…

By Kwame Asante·Jul 30, 2026·2 min read·world

Key takeaways

  • Rep. Scott Perry (R-Penn.) introduced the No Kill Switches In Cars Act, a two-paragraph bill to repeal a driver-impairment monitoring mandate from Biden's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act before any rule takes effect.
  • The mandate would require all new vehicles to include technology that monitors driver performance for impairment and can prevent or limit vehicle operation if it detects possible intoxication.
  • NHTSA missed its 2024 deadline to codify the mandate because no commercially available technology can accurately and passively detect driver alcohol impairment, with its 2024 report calling error rates near the legal limit 'unacceptably high.'
  • Perry's bill has grown to 35 lawmakers, arguing warrantless monitoring violates the Fourth Amendment and that mandated systems raise costs and cut consumer choice.
  • Mothers Against Drunk Driving opposes repeal, projecting the fully implemented law would save more than 10,000 lives per year, citing 11,904 alcohol-impaired crash deaths in 2024.

11,904 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes in 2024, per Mothers Against Drunk Driving. The federal mandate meant to cut that number has no compliant hardware to enforce it. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Penn., now wants to repeal the mandate before a rule even takes effect.

The bill and its backing

The No Kill Switches In Cars Act, two paragraphs long, would strike a provision in former President Joe Biden's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requiring all new vehicles to include technology that "monitors a driver's performance to identify driver impairment" and can "prevent or limit vehicle operation" if the system determines the driver may be intoxicated. Perry introduced the bill with 14 co-sponsors; 21 additional lawmakers have since joined, bringing the total to 35.

Perry's core argument is Fourth Amendment: monitoring a driver without a warrant and restricting vehicle operation based on that data amounts to unlawful search and seizure. He also raised cost. Every mandated safety system adds to the purchase price and eliminates consumer choice, he said. Perry noted he does not drink, making the compliance cost a pure externality from his perspective.

The technology gap NHTSA cannot close

NHTSA missed its 2024 deadline to codify the mandate into vehicle manufacturing regulations. The agency's own 2024 report to Congress explains why: most technologies reviewed were in early research stages or were not designed for in-vehicle use. The report's conclusion is unambiguous. "Currently, detection technology around the legal limit continues to have an error rate that would be unacceptably high," it stated. No commercially available technology exists that detects driver alcohol impairment accurately and passively. NHTSA confirmed to Fox News Digital it is still evaluating public comments on its research.

MADD's counter

Mothers Against Drunk Driving rejects Perry's framing entirely. The organization stated it does not support government surveillance, remote vehicle control, GPS tracking, or the collection of personal driving data. Its position: the law directs NHTSA to develop a standard through a transparent rulemaking with public input, rigorous testing, and privacy safeguards. MADD projects the fully implemented law would save more than 10,000 lives per year. The group warned that delays built on what it called inaccurate descriptions of the law's requirements only extend the toll drunk driving takes on families.

The 2024 death count, 11,904, is the figure both sides are fighting over.

Share
Source: foxnews.com
© 2026 NewsMeter

Frequently asked

What is the No Kill Switches In Cars Act?

It is a two-paragraph bill introduced by Rep. Scott Perry that would strike the provision in Biden's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act requiring new vehicles to include driver-impairment monitoring technology.

Why hasn't the vehicle impairment mandate taken effect?

NHTSA missed its 2024 deadline because most reviewed technologies were in early research or not designed for in-vehicle use, and no commercially available system can accurately and passively detect alcohol impairment.

What is Perry's main argument against the mandate?

Perry argues that monitoring a driver without a warrant and restricting vehicle operation based on that data amounts to unlawful search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment, and he also cites added cost and reduced consumer choice.

What is MADD's position on the bill?

MADD rejects Perry's framing, says it does not support surveillance or remote vehicle control, and supports the law as directing NHTSA to develop a standard through transparent rulemaking with privacy safeguards that it projects would save more than 10,000 lives per year.

How many people died in alcohol-impaired crashes in 2024?

According to Mothers Against Drunk Driving, 11,904 people died in alcohol-impaired crashes in 2024, the figure both sides are fighting over.