MACRO10-year Treasury yield reaches 5.07 percent, highest since 2007Oct 1, 2026
FPHFive Point Holdings Extends Great Park Development Agreement to 2028Oct 1, 2026
$BTCBitcoin Dips 3.2% as Clarity Act Vote Fails in SenateOct 1, 2026
EARNINGSOshkosh Backlog Slides 3.3% Year Over Year Amid Margin PressureOct 1, 2026
WORLDMaine poll shows Collins leads Jackson by 3 pointsOct 1, 2026
WORLDFDA nominee Heidi Overton declines to call healthcare a human rightOct 1, 2026
WORLDFox News outdraws CNN and MS NOW combined in Q3 2026Sep 30, 2026
RVPRetractable Technologies declares quarterly preferred dividendsSep 30, 2026
MACRO10-year Treasury yield reaches 5.07 percent, highest since 2007Oct 1, 2026
FPHFive Point Holdings Extends Great Park Development Agreement to 2028Oct 1, 2026
$BTCBitcoin Dips 3.2% as Clarity Act Vote Fails in SenateOct 1, 2026
EARNINGSOshkosh Backlog Slides 3.3% Year Over Year Amid Margin PressureOct 1, 2026
WORLDMaine poll shows Collins leads Jackson by 3 pointsOct 1, 2026
WORLDFDA nominee Heidi Overton declines to call healthcare a human rightOct 1, 2026
WORLDFox News outdraws CNN and MS NOW combined in Q3 2026Sep 30, 2026
RVPRetractable Technologies declares quarterly preferred dividendsSep 30, 2026

Bitcoin's Second Capitulation Wave Runs at Half the Intensity of February's Selloff

On-chain analysis shows that Bitcoin's current wave of capitulation selling is running at roughly half the intensity of the episode recorded in February, according to data cited by Futu NiuNiu. The finding points to a gradual easing of…

By Reuben Salcedo·May 30, 2026·2 min read·crypto·$BTC

Key takeaways

  • Bitcoin's current capitulation selling wave is running at roughly half the intensity of the February episode, according to data cited by Futu NiuNiu.
  • A second distinct wave of forced selling has been confirmed, indicating selling has not stopped but is gradually waning.
  • The halving of intensity between the first and second waves suggests the pool of holders willing to sell at a loss is shrinking with each wave.
  • The on-chain data identifies the direction of sell-side pressure but does not establish a price floor for Bitcoin or predict when or how large a third wave might be.
  • On-chain flow data supports the case that aggregate selling pressure is declining, even though it has not yet fully exhausted itself.

On-chain analysis shows that Bitcoin's current wave of capitulation selling is running at roughly half the intensity of the episode recorded in February, according to data cited by Futu NiuNiu. The finding points to a gradual easing of sell-side pressure, though a second distinct wave of forced selling has been confirmed. The contrast between the two episodes is the key signal analysts are watching.

What the On-Chain Data Shows

The February capitulation event set the baseline for this comparison. The current, second wave registers at approximately half that magnitude on the intensity metrics Futu NiuNiu referenced — meaning fewer coins are changing hands at a loss per unit of time relative to the earlier episode. Capitulation intensity, in on-chain analysis, typically measures the scale of coins moved below their acquisition cost; a lower reading indicates that holders are either waiting out the drawdown or have already sold.

Reading the "Gradually Waning" Signal

The phrase "gradually waning" carries analytical weight here. It does not mean selling has stopped — a second wave implies fresh cohorts of holders who bought after February are now underwater and exiting. What the data suggests is that the pool of sellers willing to realize losses is shrinking with each successive wave. A halving of intensity between wave one and wave two is consistent with a market working through its weakest hands in stages rather than in a single flush.

What This Reading Does Not Confirm

The analysis identifies direction, not destination. Futu NiuNiu's data does not establish a price floor for $BTC, nor does it indicate when a third wave might materialize or how large it could be. Capitulation intensity can re-accelerate if a new catalyst drives spot prices lower and pulls a fresh cohort of holders into loss territory. The current reading is a trailing measure of realized stress, not a forward guarantee of stabilization.

The practical takeaway from the comparison: the market's second capitulation wave has been materially smaller than its first, and on-chain flow data supports the case that aggregate selling pressure is declining — even if it has not yet fully exhausted itself.

Share
© 2026 NewsMeter

Frequently asked

How does the current Bitcoin capitulation wave compare to February's?

The current second wave is registering at approximately half the intensity of the February capitulation event on the metrics cited by Futu NiuNiu, meaning fewer coins are being sold at a loss per unit of time.

What does capitulation intensity measure?

In on-chain analysis, capitulation intensity typically measures the scale of coins moved below their acquisition cost, with a lower reading indicating holders are either waiting out the drawdown or have already sold.

Does this data confirm that Bitcoin has reached a price bottom?

No, the analysis identifies direction rather than destination; it does not establish a price floor for Bitcoin nor guarantee stabilization.

Could the selling pressure increase again?

Yes, capitulation intensity can re-accelerate if a new catalyst drives spot prices lower and pulls a fresh cohort of holders into loss territory.

What does 'gradually waning' mean in this context?

It does not mean selling has stopped, but rather that the pool of sellers willing to realize losses is shrinking with each successive wave.