SLXNSilexion doses first patient in Phase 2/3 pancreatic cancer trialSep 30, 2026
REGULATORYAtlassian CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes rejects SaaSpocalypse narrativeSep 30, 2026
$BTCAnalyst ranks Bitcoin above Dogecoin as superior crypto buySep 30, 2026
WORLDUS military completes withdrawal of troops from Iraq after 12-year missionSep 30, 2026
MACROBrent crude $110 threshold triggers renewed VaR shock volatilitySep 30, 2026
ENERGYLiz Peek warns voters against electing anti-US candidates in midtermsSep 30, 2026
TECXTectonic Reports Favorable TX2100 Phase 1a Data, Gains FDA Fast TrackSep 30, 2026
SOCSable Offshore targets Q4 2026 restart of Platform Hondo with 9 Perf AddsSep 30, 2026
SLXNSilexion doses first patient in Phase 2/3 pancreatic cancer trialSep 30, 2026
REGULATORYAtlassian CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes rejects SaaSpocalypse narrativeSep 30, 2026
$BTCAnalyst ranks Bitcoin above Dogecoin as superior crypto buySep 30, 2026
WORLDUS military completes withdrawal of troops from Iraq after 12-year missionSep 30, 2026
MACROBrent crude $110 threshold triggers renewed VaR shock volatilitySep 30, 2026
ENERGYLiz Peek warns voters against electing anti-US candidates in midtermsSep 30, 2026
TECXTectonic Reports Favorable TX2100 Phase 1a Data, Gains FDA Fast TrackSep 30, 2026
SOCSable Offshore targets Q4 2026 restart of Platform Hondo with 9 Perf AddsSep 30, 2026

Bank of Korea Moves CBDC Pilot Into Phase Two With Deposit Token Integration

South Korea's central bank, the Bank of Korea, is advancing its central bank digital currency pilot into a second phase, with deposit tokens set to be integrated into existing banking systems for real-world usage testing. The shift marks a…

By Warren Ashby·Jun 22, 2026·2 min read·crypto

Key takeaways

  • The Bank of Korea is advancing its central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot into a second phase that integrates deposit tokens into existing banking systems for real-world testing.
  • Deposit tokens are digital representations of commercial bank deposits, meaning holders keep a claim on their commercial bank rather than directly on the central bank.
  • The advance to phase two signals that the first phase produced results sufficient to justify broader testing, though the source does not detail the metrics or participating banks.
  • The available reporting includes no transaction volumes, participating institution names, timelines, or budget figures for the program.
  • The deposit token approach preserves the existing two-tier banking structure while adding programmability and settlement efficiency that cash cannot provide.

South Korea's central bank, the Bank of Korea, is advancing its central bank digital currency pilot into a second phase, with deposit tokens set to be integrated into existing banking systems for real-world usage testing. The shift marks a concrete step beyond conceptual development, moving the program into live infrastructure.

What the Second Phase Actually Involves

Deposit tokens are digital representations of commercial bank deposits — not the central bank's own liability, but a bank-issued instrument sitting on top of a CBDC rail. The distinction matters: holders keep a claim on their commercial bank, not directly on the central bank. Integrating these tokens into existing banking systems means the pilot is testing whether the plumbing already in place at South Korean lenders can carry a new class of digital instrument without a wholesale rebuild.

The Bank of Korea's decision to advance to a second phase signals that the first phase — typically concept validation and limited technical trials in most CBDC programs — produced results sufficient to justify broader testing. The source does not detail what metrics cleared that bar or which banks are participating in the integration work.

What the Source Does Not Say

No transaction volumes, participating institution names, timelines, or budget figures appear in the available reporting. The source does not specify how many banks will integrate deposit tokens, what the test scenarios look like, or whether retail or wholesale payments are the primary target. Anyone citing numbers for this program is working from sources beyond what has been reported here.

That gap is worth noting. CBDC pilots routinely generate headline momentum well ahead of meaningful data. The Bank of Korea's program is entering a phase where it will have to show deposit tokens functioning under real banking conditions — settlement finality, interoperability with existing payment rails, and the question of who holds credit risk if a participating bank fails. Phase two will not answer all of those questions, but it is where real answers start to accumulate.

South Korea's Position in the CBDC Field

South Korea has been an active participant in the global wave of central bank digital currency exploration. The Bank of Korea's deposit token approach aligns with a model several major economies are examining as an alternative to a direct retail CBDC, in which the central bank would hold individual accounts. The deposit token structure preserves the existing two-tier banking relationship — central bank issues the base layer, commercial banks handle customer-facing activity — while adding programmability and settlement efficiency that physical cash cannot provide.

Whether that efficiency justifies the integration cost, and for whom, is the question phase two is meant to answer.

Share
Source: theblock.co
© 2026 NewsMeter

Frequently asked

What is a deposit token in this CBDC pilot?

A deposit token is a digital representation of a commercial bank deposit, a bank-issued instrument sitting on top of a CBDC rail, so holders retain a claim on their commercial bank rather than on the central bank.

What does phase two of the Bank of Korea's pilot involve?

Phase two integrates deposit tokens into existing banking systems to test whether current infrastructure at South Korean lenders can carry a new class of digital instrument under real banking conditions without a wholesale rebuild.

Which banks are participating and what are the transaction volumes?

The source does not specify participating institution names, transaction volumes, timelines, or budget figures, nor how many banks will integrate deposit tokens.

How does the deposit token model differ from a direct retail CBDC?

Unlike a direct retail CBDC where the central bank would hold individual accounts, the deposit token model preserves the two-tier banking relationship, with the central bank issuing the base layer and commercial banks handling customer-facing activity.

What questions is phase two meant to answer?

Phase two is meant to start showing deposit tokens functioning under real conditions, including settlement finality, interoperability with existing payment rails, and who holds credit risk if a participating bank fails, as well as whether the efficiency justifies the integration cost.